| |
Dual Diagnosis is an expectation, not an exception. “Implies the need for an integrated system planning process, in which
each funding stream, each program, all clinical practices, and all clinician
competencies are designed proactively to address individuals with
co-occurring disorders who present in each component of the system already”
(Focus on system planning).
Re-establish the Behavioral Healthcare Taskforce as the policy making
body to oversee the planning and change process, as outlined in the
Co-occurring State Incentive Grant (COSIG) and the Co-occurring Policy
Academy Plan.
| |
Action A Formalize Deputy Secretary of
Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH) as chair of Taskforce |
| |
Action B Established membership of Taskforce to include
Governor Health Policy Advisor, Assistant Secretary of Office of
Mental Health (OMH), Assistant Secretary of Office for Addictive
Disorders (OAD), Director of Bureau of Health Financing, Chair of
Mental Health Planning Council, Chair of Governor’s Commission on
Addictive Disorders, Executive Director of Capital Area Human
Services District, Private Provider representative (currently filled
by LA Association of Ambulatory Healthcare representative),
representative from Client Advisory Board, Assistant Secretary of
Office of Public Health |
| |
Action C Taskforce will utilize committees to develop
recommendations and implement detailed work plans to carry out the
planning and change process. Committees to include: Funding,
Clinical Protocol, Workforce Development and Management Information
Systems/ Evaluation. Committees will be charged by the Taskforce and
committee chairs will attend Taskforce meetings and provide
additional staff support as needed. |
 |
Action D Primary staff to the Taskforce will include
COSIG Project Directors, COSIG Project Coordinator, and COSIG
Administrative Assistant. |
| |
Action E Additional key staff are encouraged to attend
Taskforce meetings. |
Develop statewide written strategic plan and timeline to support the
implementation and operation of Co-occurring Disorder Capability (CODC).
 |
Action A Adopt CODC definition |
| |
Action B Revise current agency mission
statements, target populations, and planning and service development
activities to reflect CODC. |
| |
Action C Adopt ‘no wrong door’ policy to
include the development of integrated screening, assessment, MIS,
referral, follow up, and evaluation of the no wrong door concept
(more detail provided in breakdown of principles 5, 7, 8). |
| |
Action D Assess current service system for
gaps through the following: |
| |
 |
1. |
Use of the Comprehensive, Continuous Integrated
Systems of Care Outcome Fidelity and Implementation Tool (COFIT),
the Comorbidity Program Audit and Self-survey (COMPASS), and the
Co-occurring Disorders Education Competency Assessment Tool (CODECAT) |
| |
2. |
Local focus groups convened by Gov. Commission on
Addictive Disorders |
| |
3. |
Input from Client Advisory Board |
| |
4. |
Work of the Clinical Protocol Committee |
| |
5. |
Consultations with experts in the field of
co-occurring. |
| |
Action E Adopt and mandate set of core
competencies and guiding principles (more detail provided in
Principle 7) |
| |
Action F Refinement of existing services
and development of specialized programs to obtain CODC (more detail
provided in Principle 7) |
Assure program resources equally support CODC for currently served target
population. Because plan targets CODC for current caseloads and no expansion
into the unserved population is expected, limited fiscal impact is to be
expected.
 |
Action A Maximize COSIG funds
to ensure appropriate initial training and ongoing competency
development. |
| |
Action B Identify resources to support drug
screening within OMH system. |
| |
Action C Identify resources to provide
psychiatric services and medications, primarily within OAD system. |
| |
 |
1. |
Evaluate Medicaid funding through
establishment of Addictive Disorder (AD) clinics as satellite Mental
Health (MH) clinics |
| |
2. |
Input from Client Advisory Board |
| |
Action D Explore additional possible
funding streams. |
Support Local Systems of Care** and Local Steering Committees in
development and implementation of CODC at the local level.
 |
Action A Through COSIG funds, provide
group facilitators to serve as staff to the local committee, provide
training, and technical assistance as needed. |
| |
Action B Assure development and implementation of local
CODC plan which will address administration and management, policy
and funding, staffing and supervision, interagency service network,
cross training, quality and outcomes management, management
information systems. |
| |
Action C Develop mechanism to ensure direct consistent
flow of communication from the state level Taskforce to the Local
Systems of Care & Local Steering Committees and from the Local
Systems of Care & Local Steering Committees to the direct service
staff, and visa versa. For the Human Service Districts and
Authorities, flow of information occurs through the Executive
Directors. |
|
|